These are not two answers to the same question. Timeshift takes snapshots of Linux system files so a bad update or a broken driver can be undone, and its own documentation says plainly that it is not a backup tool and is not meant to protect user data. Copy Shelter protects your files: encrypted, kept wherever you choose, and read back to check them.
They solve different failures. Timeshift undoes a system that broke itself. Copy Shelter gets a file back after it was deleted, corrupted, or the whole machine was lost. Running both, for the job each is actually built for, is a reasonable setup.
Can you get a file back today, from the backup as it is now, on a machine that has never seen it? Try it with one file before you need it. Copy Shelter's answer is csctl and the published format.
No, and Timeshift's own documentation agrees: it protects system files, not personal ones, and says plainly that it is not a backup tool. Copy Shelter protects your files, so the two do different jobs.
Not by default, and its own README recommends against including them, since a restore overwrites whatever changed since the snapshot.
Yes, open source and free, packaged in most Linux distributions' own repositories.
Yes, for one backup location, with no time limit. Pro adds more locations, older versions and scheduled deep checks, on every platform it runs on.
Timeshift figures are from github.com/linuxmint/timeshift, its own README, read on 19 September 2026. Related: Copy Shelter and Deja Dup, Copy Shelter for Linux.